[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Expire and Delete again

To: j.krinke@gmx.de
Subject: Re: Expire and Delete again
From: Kim-Minh Kaplan <kmkaplan@vocatex.fr>
Date: 24 Sep 1999 15:58:06 +0200
Cc: nnimap@extundo.com
In-Reply-To: Jens Krinke's message of "Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:35:58 -0400"
References: <d8hso45uuri.fsf@aruba.fmi.uni-passau.de> <vafaeqcd5gz.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <37EB7E3E.6A229A50@watson.ibm.com>
Sender: kaplan@kloug.western.fr
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)

Jens Krinke writes :

> Or why not make it configurable to use gnus-expire or \Deleted?

These are two different marks: use E (M-x gnus-summary-mark-as-expirable)
to mark a message as expirable (i.e mark it with gnus-expire) and B delete
(M-x gnus-summary-delete-article) to nuke an article (i.e mark is as
\Deleted).

Kim-Minh.

References:
- Expire and Delete again
  - From: Jens Krinke <j.krinke@gmx.de>
- Re: Expire and Delete again
  - From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)
- Re: Expire and Delete again
  - From: Jens Krinke <jkrinke@watson.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Expire and Delete again
Next by Date: Corner case where nov cache kills performance
Prev by thread: Re: Expire and Delete again
Next by thread: Re: Expire and Delete again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread