Re: Mark as unread

[Vadim Gutnik <gutnik@mtl.mit.edu>]

Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@streapadair.freeserve.co.uk> writes:

> David> David S. Goldberg <URL:mailto:dsg@mitre.org>
> 
> 0> In article <m1bogeo4dh8.fsf@blackbird.mitre.org>, David wrote:
> 
> David> Do you have gnus-suppress-duplicates and / or
> David> gnus-save-duplicate-list set to t?  If so, then duplicate
> David> suppression is probably what's biting you in this case.
> 
> I do.  But it's counter-intuitive that a read article marked unread
> should be treated as if it was a new incoming article.  Is there
> anything we can do to improve this?

Eh? That's what gnus does, and I like it, and use the feature. It
seems intuitive to me: that's sort of the point of marking the article 
unread, isn't it? 

	Vadim