[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mark as unread

To: nnimap@extundo.com
Subject: Re: Mark as unread
From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@streapadair.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: 27 Sep 1999 16:57:25 +0100
In-Reply-To: dsg@mitre.org's message of "27 Sep 1999 10:48:35 -0400"
Organization: Citrix Systems (Cambridge) <URL:http://citrix.com/>
References: <u7llfaly3.fsf@lanber.cam.citrix.com> <ilun1ubusx4.fsf@badis.pdc.kth.se> <uso40v9my.fsf@lanber.cam.citrix.com> <m1bogeo4dh8.fsf@blackbird.mitre.org>

David> David S. Goldberg <URL:mailto:dsg@mitre.org>

0> In article <m1bogeo4dh8.fsf@blackbird.mitre.org>, David wrote:

David> Do you have gnus-suppress-duplicates and / or
David> gnus-save-duplicate-list set to t?  If so, then duplicate
David> suppression is probably what's biting you in this case.

I do.  But it's counter-intuitive that a read article marked unread
should be treated as if it was a new incoming article.  Is there
anything we can do to improve this?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mark as unread
  - From: Vadim Gutnik <gutnik@mtl.mit.edu>

References:
- Mark as unread
  - From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@streapadair.freeserve.co.uk>
- Re: Mark as unread
  - From: Simon Josefsson <jas@pdc.kth.se>
- Re: Mark as unread
  - From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@streapadair.freeserve.co.uk>
- Re: Mark as unread
  - From: dsg@mitre.org (David S. Goldberg)

Prev by Date: Newbie questions
Next by Date: Re: Newbie questions
Prev by thread: Re: Mark as unread
Next by thread: Re: Mark as unread
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread