Re: Group foo not uidvalid?

["Yair Friedman (Jerusalem)" <YAIRFR@Amdocs.com>]

Matthias Johnson <penguin@research.att.com> writes:

> >>>>> "KG" == Kai Großjohann <Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE> writes:
> 
> KG> Matthias Johnson <penguin@research.att.com> writes:
> >> So with all this uidvalidity stuff going on, I have something that
> >> I was wondering about.  After being repeatedly asked to type 'yes'
> >> I changed the prompt to use y-or-n-p.  Of course this got annoying
> >> too so I just made the test evaluate to 't'.
> 
> KG> Does it not work for you to edit the group parameters to remove
> KG> the question?  I did that, and now I'm a happy camper.
> 
> Well, it does work, but doesn't the uidvalidity field keep coming
> back?  I sometimes read through a web interface and then uidvalidity
> gets out of wack or when I keep checking mail in an empty folder it
> also seems to happen.
> 

I also had a lot of problems when there was a server reset, I had to
manually delete them from the .newsrc.eld.

Can we have nnimap-rebuild-uidvalidity so such?
--
Yair Friedman.