Re: [PATCH] Multiple Servers / APPENDUID,UIDNEXT

[Simon Josefsson <jas@pdc.kth.se>]

radford@robby.caltech.edu (Jim Radford) writes:

> Are you woried about speed?

Not really (can't you tell? :-)). It clotters my *Message* buffer so I
miss all interesting messages. :-)

> I'd really like to see that kept at a level that shows messages by
> default, at least until we work out the speed of getting the active
> file and such.  This way we are constantly reminded of how inefficient
> we are so that we get motivated to fix it :-).  Try connecting to the
> annonymous server at cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu.  I think we go WAY to long
> without any status at all.

Perhaps the following would do it, instead?  If you still disagree,
I'll apply your patch.

/s

--- nnimap.el	1998/08/12 13:31:29	1.8
+++ nnimap.el	1998/08/12 17:38:17
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@
                         (concat nnimap-list-method " "
                                 (car pattern) " "
                                 (cdr pattern)))))
-        (gnus-message 8 "Generating active list for %s" server)
+        (gnus-message 5 "Generating active list for %s" server)
         (mapatoms 'nnimap-request-list-mapper imap-data-folder)))
     (setq nnimap-group-alist (nnmail-get-active))
     t))
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@
 (deffoo nnimap-request-update-info (group info &optional server)
   (when (nnimap-possibly-change-group group server) ;; SELECT
     (with-current-buffer nnimap-server-buffer
-      (gnus-message 9 "Updating active info for mailbox %s" group)
+      (gnus-message 5 "Updating active info for mailbox %s" group)
 
       ;; extend info to have parameters (otherwise when we set them, 
       ;; they don't get set)